Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
TIP
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Dat zou ik ook niet van buiten weten, maar ik raad aan om het hele boek te lezen zodat je de context mee hebt en de acceptatie van het antwoord toch een stuk hoger zal liggen. De precieze bladzijde zou trouwens afhangen van welke uitgave je hebt. Ik koop mijn boeken altijd in het goedkoopste formaat, en dat is meestal het kleinste.
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Ik heb hem in ebook formaatsintorama schreef: ↑2 december 2021, 09:12Dat zou ik ook niet van buiten weten, maar ik raad aan om het hele boek te lezen zodat je de context mee hebt en de acceptatie van het antwoord toch een stuk hoger zal liggen. De precieze bladzijde zou trouwens afhangen van welke uitgave je hebt. Ik koop mijn boeken altijd in het goedkoopste formaat, en dat is meestal het kleinste.
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Ik heb onlangs ergens gelezen dat JD.com een betere relatie heeft met de communistische partij dan BABA. Zelf kan je dat natuurlijk niet checken…
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Het vallende mes.
KWEB 24,99 USD −2,04 (7,56%)vandaag
BABA 111,54 USD−10,50 (8,60%)vandaag
Hoe laag kan het nog gaan ?
KWEB 24,99 USD −2,04 (7,56%)vandaag
BABA 111,54 USD−10,50 (8,60%)vandaag
Hoe laag kan het nog gaan ?
-
troglodytes
- Hero Member
- Berichten: 741
- Lid geworden op: 27 dec 2019
- Contacteer:
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Amai! Dat is mijn aankoop van het jaar geweest!
Voorlopige balans: -20,74% (bijna 5000 ballen kwijt :-)
Voorlopige balans: -20,74% (bijna 5000 ballen kwijt :-)
-
kierkegaard
- Full Member
- Berichten: 185
- Lid geworden op: 29 jul 2018
- Contacteer:
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Hier een BIDU belegger. Heel volatiel. In aan 100, dus nog op een comfortabele 35%. Ik vind de waardering zeer OK, en ben van plan dit LT te houden.
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
http://www.csrc.gov.cn/pub/csrc_en/news ... 09377.html
Reporter: Recently, the SEC released its rules for implementing the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act and certain Chinese company announced that it started to delist from the U.S.. This has attracted wide attention in the market. What is the CSRC’s comment on this matter and what are your views on prospect of audit oversight cooperation between China and U.S. and that of domestic companies’ listing in the U.S.?
Spokesperson: We have taken notice of this recent development and the market’s concerns over the audit oversight issues and the prospect of domestic companies listing in the U.S. The CSRC and relevant Chinese regulatory authorities have always been open to and fully respect Chinese companies’ independent choices of overseas listing venues in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Recently, some overseas media reported that Chinese regulators will ban overseas listing of companies with VIE structure and demand Chinese companies to delist from U.S. stock exchanges, which is a completely misunderstanding and misinterpretation. As far as we know, some domestic companies are actively communicating with domestic and foreign regulators to seek listing in the U.S. markets.
In terms of audit oversight cooperation, the CSRC has recently conducted candid and constructive communications with the U.S. SEC and PCAOB to address issues in bilateral cooperation and has made positive progress on several important issues. We believed that as long as regulators on both sides continue to conduct dialogues and negotiations in the spirit of mutual respect and trust, and deal with regulatory issues in a rational, pragmatic and professional way, we will certainly be able to find a mutually acceptable path of cooperation. In fact, both sides have been cooperating on audit oversight of US-listed Chinese companies, and worked together on pilot inspection programmes in order to find a more efficient way of cooperation, which has laid a good foundation for future cooperation. In recent years, however, certain political fractions in the U.S. have turned capital market regulation into part of their politicizing tools, waging unwarranted clampdowns on Chinese companies and coercing them into delisting from U.S. stock exchanges. This lose-lose mentality goes against the fundamental principles and rule of law of the market economy, harms the interests of global investors, undermines the international status of the U.S. capital markets, and benefits nobody. In today’s era when the capital markets are highly globalized, it has become more imperative than ever for regulatory authorities to engage with each other on audit oversight cooperation in a pragmatic, rational and professional manner. Forcing Chinese companies to delist from U.S. stock exchanges is by no means a responsible policy option.
The series of policy measures that relevant Chinese regulatory authorities have introduced in the past months with respect to regulating the development of the platform economy are aimed at limiting monopoly, protecting SMEs, safeguarding data and personal information security, and preventing the disorderly expansion of capital. Regulators in other parts of the world are also taking various regulatory measures against such emerging issues and challenges, with a view to promoting the sound and sustainable development of platform economy. Therefore, relevant policy initiatives of the Chinese government are not targeted at specific industries or private companies, nor are they necessarily connected to overseas listing of Chinese companies.
In the process of implementing the relevant policy measures, the Chinese regulatory authorities will continue to steadfastly promote reform and opening-up, stick to the principle of the “Two Unwaverings”, strive to engage with stakeholders including investors, companies and peer regulators, and further enhance policy transparency and predictability. CSRC will also continue its candid dialogues with its U.S. counterparts, and endeavour to resolve the remaining issues in audit oversight cooperation in the near future.
Reporter: Recently, the SEC released its rules for implementing the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act and certain Chinese company announced that it started to delist from the U.S.. This has attracted wide attention in the market. What is the CSRC’s comment on this matter and what are your views on prospect of audit oversight cooperation between China and U.S. and that of domestic companies’ listing in the U.S.?
Spokesperson: We have taken notice of this recent development and the market’s concerns over the audit oversight issues and the prospect of domestic companies listing in the U.S. The CSRC and relevant Chinese regulatory authorities have always been open to and fully respect Chinese companies’ independent choices of overseas listing venues in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Recently, some overseas media reported that Chinese regulators will ban overseas listing of companies with VIE structure and demand Chinese companies to delist from U.S. stock exchanges, which is a completely misunderstanding and misinterpretation. As far as we know, some domestic companies are actively communicating with domestic and foreign regulators to seek listing in the U.S. markets.
In terms of audit oversight cooperation, the CSRC has recently conducted candid and constructive communications with the U.S. SEC and PCAOB to address issues in bilateral cooperation and has made positive progress on several important issues. We believed that as long as regulators on both sides continue to conduct dialogues and negotiations in the spirit of mutual respect and trust, and deal with regulatory issues in a rational, pragmatic and professional way, we will certainly be able to find a mutually acceptable path of cooperation. In fact, both sides have been cooperating on audit oversight of US-listed Chinese companies, and worked together on pilot inspection programmes in order to find a more efficient way of cooperation, which has laid a good foundation for future cooperation. In recent years, however, certain political fractions in the U.S. have turned capital market regulation into part of their politicizing tools, waging unwarranted clampdowns on Chinese companies and coercing them into delisting from U.S. stock exchanges. This lose-lose mentality goes against the fundamental principles and rule of law of the market economy, harms the interests of global investors, undermines the international status of the U.S. capital markets, and benefits nobody. In today’s era when the capital markets are highly globalized, it has become more imperative than ever for regulatory authorities to engage with each other on audit oversight cooperation in a pragmatic, rational and professional manner. Forcing Chinese companies to delist from U.S. stock exchanges is by no means a responsible policy option.
The series of policy measures that relevant Chinese regulatory authorities have introduced in the past months with respect to regulating the development of the platform economy are aimed at limiting monopoly, protecting SMEs, safeguarding data and personal information security, and preventing the disorderly expansion of capital. Regulators in other parts of the world are also taking various regulatory measures against such emerging issues and challenges, with a view to promoting the sound and sustainable development of platform economy. Therefore, relevant policy initiatives of the Chinese government are not targeted at specific industries or private companies, nor are they necessarily connected to overseas listing of Chinese companies.
In the process of implementing the relevant policy measures, the Chinese regulatory authorities will continue to steadfastly promote reform and opening-up, stick to the principle of the “Two Unwaverings”, strive to engage with stakeholders including investors, companies and peer regulators, and further enhance policy transparency and predictability. CSRC will also continue its candid dialogues with its U.S. counterparts, and endeavour to resolve the remaining issues in audit oversight cooperation in the near future.
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Ja ik had dat ook. De truuk is om boeken te zoeken over onderwerpen die je echt interesseren, en ze in je moedertaal te lezen. Op die manier krijg je zin in lezen en ga je op den duur divergeren naar andere onderwerpen en talen. Zonder dat je het doorhebt ben je aan het bijleren. En het houdt je af van je verslavingen zoals dagelijks beurskoersen bekijken en dwaze internetfora bezoeken in de hoop dat daar nuttige en pasklare antwoorden te vinden zijn.
Laatst gewijzigd door sintorama op 6 december 2021, 13:36, 1 keer totaal gewijzigd.
Re: Beleggen in Chinese internetbedrijven
Baba gaat nog eens bijna 10% lager vandaag.
Bijgekocht.
Bijgekocht.